Clobbr

// Clobbr vs Apache Bench

A modern Apache Bench alternative with a GUI and result history

Apache Bench (ab) has been shipping with Apache HTTPD for decades, and it shows. Clobbr is what you reach for when you want the same one-command simplicity, but with a GUI, GraphQL awareness, result history, and export formats that aren't gnuplot files.

Download the Clobbr api speed test app on the App StoreDownload the Clobbr api speed test app on the Microsoft StoreGet Clobbr api speed test CLI from npmView or download Clobbr api speed test on Github

What Apache Bench is actually good at

Let's start with the honest part. ab is:

  • Universally available. It's bundled with Apache HTTPD; on most Linux servers you already have it.
  • Tiny. Single binary, almost no config, starts instantly.
  • Perfect for a quick smoke test. If you want to know whether an endpoint survives 1000 GETs, ab gives you the answer in seconds.

For many "does this URL still respond?" moments, that's genuinely all you need. Clobbr is not trying to replace ab in those moments.

Where ab falls short

The cracks show as soon as you're doing something slightly more realistic than a single GET on a public endpoint:

  • POST with JSON is painful. You set a content type flag, point to a local file with the body, and hope it's encoded the way you expect.
  • GraphQL is a second-class citizen. ab doesn't know the difference between a query and a mutation, so your results conflate both.
  • Dynamic headers are impossible. Anything that needs a fresh auth token, a signed request, or a computed header is outside ab's model.
  • No history. You run a test, you read stdout, you either save it or you don't. Comparing runs over time means rolling your own pipeline.
  • No GUI. If you're on a Mac or Windows laptop, just getting ab installed and useful is its own small project.

Feature-by-feature: Clobbr vs Apache Bench

How the two tools stack up on the things people actually hit when load testing something more structured than a homepage GET.

Clobbr vs Apache Bench feature comparison
FeatureClobbrApache Bench (ab)
InterfaceDesktop app + CLICLI only (terminal-bound)
HTTP methodsGET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, and moreMostly GET + POST with a file payload
GraphQL supportAuto-detects GraphQL, splits stats per operationNot designed for GraphQL; manual POST only
HeadersPlain text or scripted (e.g. dynamic bearer tokens)Static only, one -H flag at a time
Result statisticsp50, p95, p99, std dev, min/max, chartsBasic mean + percentiles in stdout
Result historyBrowsable history across runs, chart + table viewsNone. Pipe stdout to a file yourself.
Output formatsGUI, plus CSV / JSON / YAML export from the CLIPlain text, -g for gnuplot data
Scripting / dynamic valuesYes (inline JS scripts for headers & payloads)None
Install footprintSmall desktop app or single npm installBundled with Apache HTTPD on most systems
AvailabilitymacOS, Windows, any Node-capable CIAny POSIX system; getting it on Windows is awkward

Migrating common ab flags

Here are the common ab invocations and where each flag lands in Clobbr:

  • -n (total requests) → iterations field
  • -c (concurrent requests) → parallel toggle + concurrency count
  • -H (header) → headers editor (plain text or scripted)
  • -T (content type) → just set Content-Type in headers
  • -p (POST file) → paste the body into the JSON payload editor
  • -k (keepalive) → on by default
  • -t (time limit) → set a request timeout in advanced settings

// FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache Bench deprecated or unsafe to use?
Not deprecated. ab is still maintained with Apache HTTPD and it's fine for a quick one-off smoke test on a GET endpoint. The issue is scope: it was written in a different era of the web and doesn't know about JSON APIs, GraphQL, JWT auth flows, or reading percentiles off a chart. If your test needs anything beyond 'how fast is this URL', you'll feel ab's age quickly.
Can Clobbr replace ab in all scenarios?
For the common case, yes. That case being: load testing an HTTP or HTTPS endpoint with specific headers, a JSON payload, N iterations, and usable stats. If you need a single portable binary that runs on any server without Node installed, or you're scripting against legacy Apache monitoring tools that parse ab's specific output format, ab still fits.
How do I translate my ab command to Clobbr?
The mapping is straightforward. For ab -n 100 -c 10 -H "Authorization: Bearer X" https://api.example.com/: -n becomes iterations, -c becomes the parallel toggle + concurrency, -H becomes a header entry in Clobbr's header editor, and the URL is just the URL. Everything else (GET verb, defaults) transfers.
Does Clobbr have an equivalent to ab's -g flag for gnuplot?
Clobbr's CLI exports the full run data to CSV, JSON, or YAML, any of which you can pipe into gnuplot, a spreadsheet, or a notebook. For most people, though, Clobbr's built-in chart + table view is already the gnuplot step, just with zero setup.
Can I run Clobbr headless on a server like ab?
Yes, that's exactly what @clobbr/cli is for. Install it with npm, run a test headlessly, write results to a file. See the CI examples repo for starters.
Is Clobbr faster than ab?
For day-to-day HTTP load testing, the bottleneck is the network and your target server, not the client. Both tools can saturate typical APIs without breaking a sweat. The real speed difference is in how fast you can configure, re-run, and interpret a test. That's where a GUI plus result history makes a noticeable dent.

// Ship it

Try Clobbr

ab's simplicity without ab's 1996 vibes. Free CLI, lifetime license for the app, nothing sent to a server.

Download the Clobbr api speed test app on the App StoreDownload the Clobbr api speed test app on the Microsoft StoreGet Clobbr api speed test CLI from npmView or download Clobbr api speed test on Github

Lifetime license · macOS, Windows, CLI · no subscription · available Included on Setapp